The State of Homeland Security 3.0

By Nadav Morag, Ph.D., University Dean of Security Studies

CTU Homeland Security Degree - Homeland Security 3.0On Feb. 26, 2013 the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Janet Napolitano, gave her third annual address on the state of homeland security at the Brookings Institution in Washington, DC.

The Last Four Years

Under her first four years as DHS secretary, Napolitano oversaw the broadening of the focus of homeland security. Focus went from a primary interest in terrorism and counterterrorism to coping with threats such as natural disasters and allocating resources based on an assessment of risks and vulnerabilities. In providing examples in the use of risk-based methodologies, the secretary pointed to the issues of terrorism, border security, immigration enforcement, cybersecurity, and disaster preparedness and response, suggesting that she views these as priority areas for her second term.

The Next Four Years

Napolitano also charted out the near-term future of the Department of Homeland Security, something she refers to as “DHS 3.0.” She pointed out that the watchwords of DHS 3.0 will be “agility, resilience, engagement and integration.” The secretary noted that risk-based approaches to planning and budgeting will be even more crucial. Napolitano hinted that the old DHS approach to looking at issues in a one-size-fits-all lens will no longer be feasible.

For example, she referred to the issue of TSA pre-check initiatives and Global Entry for foreign travelers entering the US. These will be expanded because they focus on easing air travel for those deemed less of a risk. She similarly noted that law enforcement efforts should focus on illegal immigrants that constitute national security or public safety threats rather than spending much time dealing with illegal economic migrants who pose little risk to the country.

The secretary closed by noting that public engagement will be high on the list of their priorities. The focus will be both on pulling information (e.g., obtaining information from the public about things like suspicious activities, the impact of a disaster or public health emergency in a given area, etc.), as well as pushing information (such as providing public safety information during emergencies).

Evolution

Napolitano’s DHS 3.0 doesn’t posit a radical departure from the manner in which it does business, or the way that it is organized. It does, however, represent a logical evolution of the department’s resources and areas of focus. The money and resources put into the hands of the department, which allowed it to create broad policies that it applied across the board, are no longer available in today’s Washington, DC. Moreover, many of DHS’s policies, such as treating all airline passengers as potentially equal threats to aviation security, didn’t make sense. Certain policies were a waste of resources and caused inconvenience and economic hardship to the public.

Consequently, DHS 3.0 really represents a maturing of the homeland security field and an understanding that resources need to be applied where the risk is greatest, and where the consequence of damage and disruption, whether by terrorists, a natural disaster, a disease outbreak or other threat, is most significant.


CTU Faculty - Nadav MoragNadav Morag, Ph.D., is University Dean of Security Studies at CTU. He works on projects for the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Defense and is a published author on terrorism, security strategy, and foreign policy. Connect with Dr. Morag on Twitter @CTUHomeland.



Stay in the know. Subscribe to CTU’s blog and receive fresh updates directly to your inbox. Join us.


Image credit: Flickr/thisisbossi

 


Terms and Conditions

By providing your mobile number, you agree to receive text messages from Colorado Tech via its mobile text message provider.  You may opt out of receiving messages by texting the word STOP to 94576, or simply reply with the word STOP to any text message you receive from Colorado Tech.

While CEC or its mobile text message provider will not charge end users for receiving/responding to promotional messages, depending on the terms of your mobile phone plan, you may incur a cost from your mobile service carrier to receive and respond to any promotional text messages (standard messaging and data rates/fees and other charges may apply).  Charges will appear on your mobile phone bill or will be deducted from pre-paid amounts.  Current participating/supported carriers are: Alltel, AT&T, Boost, Cellcom, Cellular One, Cellular South, Cincinnati Bell, Cricket, Element Wireless, Golden State Cellular, iWireless, Metro PCS, Nextel, nTelos, Plateau Wireless, Sprint, T-Mobile, US Cellular, Verizon Wireless, Viaero Wireless, Virgin, and more.

×