The Six-Pack and Criminal Investigations
By Det. Ivan Kaminsky, CTU Adjunct Faculty – Criminal Justice
The goal of any investigation is to find the truth. However, sometimes methods we use to uncover the truth don’t measure up. The “six-pack” is one method that has long had a role in how law officers identify suspects recently been called into question; with other alternatives being explored for improved accuracy.
“Six-pack” is slang for a single sheet of paper with a photo of the suspect and five others who bear a resemblance. Victims and/or witnesses will view the page, offering a common response that the suspect they saw “looks most like this one” or “out of all of them, this is the closest.”
Such replies are problematic. Did the viewer identify the suspect, or did they just pick the one that is most similar? How should you as investigator value a statement like that? Might an overzealous investigator put more stock in such a statement than it merits? Won’t a defense attorney make such suggestions?
One alternative to the six-pack is a sequential lineup. With this method, the viewer is shown the same six photos, but can only view them one at a time. Since no two photos are visible at the same time, the viewer compares their memory of the suspect to each photo individually; rather than comparing the six photos to each other.
The use of a sequential lineup or a “double blind lineup,” which will be the topic of a future blog, is catching on among criminal justice practitioners nationwide. To improve accuracy, some states have introduced legislation to dictate how law enforcement agencies show lineups to witnesses. Innocence Project is a national litigation and public policy organization dedicated to exonerating wrongfully convicted individuals. They report that the wrongful identification of perpetrators by witnesses and victims is one of the most common reasons behind errant convictions which are later overturned using DNA evidence. When lawmakers and reform advocates both agree on a topic, it is one worth considering in your jurisdiction!
Have a question or comment about criminal investigation methods? Tweet @CTUJustice, or leave a comment below.
Ivan Kaminsky is an adjunct instructor in the Criminal Justice program at Colorado Technical University. A detective with the Chandler, AZ police department, he holds a variety of professional memberships and certifications in investigative techniques and tactics. He holds his undergraduate degree from Arizona State University and his M.S. degree in educational leadership from Northern Arizona University.
Line-up image credit
Terms and Conditions
By providing your mobile number, you agree to receive text messages from Colorado Tech via its mobile text message provider. You may opt out of receiving messages by texting the word STOP to 94576, or simply reply with the word STOP to any text message you receive from Colorado Tech.
While CEC or its mobile text message provider will not charge end users for receiving/responding to promotional messages, depending on the terms of your mobile phone plan, you may incur a cost from your mobile service carrier to receive and respond to any promotional text messages (standard messaging and data rates/fees and other charges may apply). Charges will appear on your mobile phone bill or will be deducted from pre-paid amounts. Current participating/supported carriers are: Alltel, AT&T, Boost, Cellcom, Cellular One, Cellular South, Cincinnati Bell, Cricket, Element Wireless, Golden State Cellular, iWireless, Metro PCS, Nextel, nTelos, Plateau Wireless, Sprint, T-Mobile, US Cellular, Verizon Wireless, Viaero Wireless, Virgin, and more.×