CTU Blogs

Is the Age Wave Ruining the U.S. Economy?

September 5, 2012 Business and Management 1 Comments

By David Glazer, J.D., MSFS, Ph.D., Adjunct Professor of Business

CTU Business and Management - US EconomyThe hidden controversy surrounding the continuing woes in the U.S. housing market and the U.S. stock market has less to do with the recession, which ended – by economic measures – two years ago.  It also has little to do with the partisan politics on Capitol Hill.  It has little to do with the European banking crises threatening the euro and the entire viability of the European Union.

What it really has to do with is the simple age wave that is seeing tens of millions of people retiring and very few people to replace these soon-to-be-retirees.

Generation Gaps
Statistically, there are approximately 77 million baby boomers in the U.S.  This population, born between 1946 and 1964 are – as of last year – reaching the retirement age of 65.  George W. Bush and Bill Clinton, recent ex-presidents, both turned 65 last year and are among the first wave to reach the milestone.  Because the baby boomer’s waited so long to have children, or had no children at all, there are only 40 million or so people in the next group –born between 1965 and 1979 – often referred to as generation X.  Baby boomers eventually did repopulate the country with generation Y, born between 1980 and 1994.  But they aren’t ready yet to take on the assets that the baby boomers are liquidating in droves over the next decade or so.

Empty Nests
Take housing for example.  Millions of new retirees are sitting in empty nest homes – the four-plus bedroom or split-level single family house in the suburbs that is now too big and expensive to hold onto.  These individuals are downsizing to active senior retirement communities.  But there aren’t enough buyers in generation X to soak up the available supply of housing coming on to the market.  As a result, the housing market remains flat to negative, despite historically low mortgage interest rates.

Economic Liquidation
The stock market is another example.  Millions of employees over the past two decades drove the DJIA from 800 in November 1982 to 15,000 in the past decade.  Since then, the average has slipped over the last few years and recently settled at 10,300.  The Baby Boomer’s were once active employees piling money into mutual fund style investments in their 401(k) or IRA accounts, which bought mainly equities.  Now, those same people are liquidating their retirement funds to supply income.  The next generation is simply not large enough to match the net redemption phenomenon just now beginning to take its toll on the market.

Eventually, generation Y will restore some balance to the situation.  Until then, this remains the largely unreported story behind why we continue to manage a slow economy despite all signals that we should be well into a strong recovery. 

Image Credit: Flickr/Anton Mitsov

 

CTU Faculty - David GlazerDr. David Glazer is an Adjunct instructor of Business at Colorado Technical University. He brings nearly 30 years of experience in the financial services industry where he served in variety of roles raging from Chief Marketing Officer, Certified Financial Planner to Certified Life Underwriter.  He holds four degrees including a JD in law, MBA in Human Resources, Masters in Financial Services and a Ph.D. in Marketing. See why he’s in. 

Comments

Carla September 24, 2012 at 04:36 PM

There is something very conflicting that I see about Baby Boomers. The current income for Baby Boomers 65k and the current income for Generation X is about 45k. I am not as a qualified as Dr. Glazer, but I can’t help but to think that the government would not have to worry about creating so many new jobs if some of the Boomers who are financially able would just retire on or around schedule. This could create a wave of promotions (Boomers hold the best jobs) and less people on unemployment and even public assistance by having more entry and mid-level positions available. Since their population is almost 80 million strong, just think about what a huge difference that would make if just 8 million or ten percent of them would retire? I am pretty sure that the last report regarding unemployment shows 14 million Americans are unemployed. According to Dave Carpenter in his article titled, “More Boomers Aspire to Careers with Social Purpose”, he states, “As many as 9 million people ages 44 to 70 already are in such careers as the second or third acts of their working lives, according to nonprofit think tank Encore.org. But that number is poised to multiply as many Boomers and others take steps to combine making a living with making a difference. Another 31 million older workers are interested in finding encore careers, based on a 2011 survey by the nonprofit.” I think that it is commendable that they want to make a difference, but can’t they just volunteer? In an article entitled, “Baby Boomer’s Savings are not Enough for Retirement” by Michael R. Burns, “Their studies conclude that 70% of American households are at risk of running out of money if they retired at age 62, the first year that you can file for Social Security. However, if these households continued to work until age 66, the percentage at risk of running out of money would fall to 45%. If these households continued to work until age 70, only 14% would be at risk for running out of money.” I will give the Boomers until the age of 66. That is how long I expect to work. After that, I expect to see at least 45% of them retire. That should start next year. Are they really concerned with having enough money for retirement or does this generation known for being workaholics just want to continue to work? As a struggling Generation Xer, with 30 years to go before retirement, I can still win this. I also think that people should stop saying that there is not enough qualified people to replace the Boomers. Even if they started retiring at the rate that I suggested, there is still enough Boomers left in the work place to train us up. Besides, more of us have degrees than that generation anyway. Don’t the Boomers want to see their kids reach their full potential? http://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2012/02/28/approaching-mid-life-are-gen-xers-doomed/

What do you think?

 
 
 

Categories

Archives