CTU Blogs

Obamacare: The good and bad

July 25, 2012 Health Sciences 7 Comments

By Jeremy Howell, MHA
CTU Adjunct Professor, Health Sciences

Healthcare ReformIn the last week of June, the Supreme Court ruled on the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), a law that attempts to reduce the number of uninsured in the United States. 

In June, USA Today cited Congressional Budget Office (CBO) statistics showing that 32 million Americans will receive health insurance once the law goes into full effect. Still, 27 million will remain uninsured and 4 million will no longer receive health insurance from their employers as a result of the law. Instead, they are expected to subscribe to a private insurance plan.  Low-wage earners may qualify for Medicaid under extended provisions of the law.   

For nearly 50 years, the government has been the owner of a public option that has been responsible for escalating the cost of healthcare: Medicaid. The government's existing public option reimburses physicians and hospitals at below market rates in an attempt to rein in cost; but between 1997 and 2005, Medicaid spending grew three times faster per enrollee than private sector plans. 

Government officials have stated that PPACA will allow more Americans to obtain healthcare insurance and overall healthcare costs will decrease.  President Obama promised that healthcare reform would "bend the cost curve down." Unfortunately, however, the law will actually increase healthcare spending in the United States.  In his paper, “Bad Medicine,” Michael Tanner of the Cato Institute states that the PPACA will cost more than $2 trillion over the first ten years of enactment and add more than $820 billion to an already staggering national debt.  However, the CBO has shown that the bill may reduce the budget deficit by $138 billion over 10 years. 

While the spending of healthcare has not or will not be contained, millions of Americans have been positively affected by the bill. Over 3 million young adults have remained on their parents' healthcare plans; 5.3 million seniors and individuals with disabilities have saved $3.7 billion on prescription drugs; and 67,000 people with pre-existing conditions have obtained insurance, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. 

On the flip-side, the CBO estimates that 10 million to 12 million workers will be dropped from their current employer coverage, even though they were promised by government officials their healthcare plan wouldn't change under the PPACA.

One thing is certain: the debate on how to provide healthcare in this country will not stop with the Supreme Court's ruling. Share your perspective in the comments below or join the conversation with our Dean of Health Sciences, Dr. Kathy Wood, on Twitter @CTUHealth.

CTU Adjunct Faculty - Jeremy HowellJeremy Howell is an adjunct professor in CTU’s College of Health Sciences. A career officer with the U.S. Navy, he is a Lieutenant in the Navy's Medical Service Corps and currently heads the human resources department at Naval Hospital Bremerton, Washington. He holds his Master’s in Health Administration from the U.S. Army-Baylor University, and his undergraduate degree from Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University.

Opinions expressed here within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of his employer(s).

Comments

Kathy R July 28, 2012 at 08:38 PM

People that are low income feel that they won't be affected with Obama Care; I feel that the bottom line is things are going to get worse for those individuals that are currently receiving free healthcare.

Denzil Walters July 27, 2012 at 10:59 PM

Lt. Jeremy Howell has succinctly described primary effects of the Affordable Health-Care Act. He has succeeded in covering controversial provisions in a style as close to objectivity as can be expected from a serious writer who has studied the AH-CA carefully and brings to the study a recall of experiences that have created strong feelings about provisions that will have an effect on the lives of every man, woman, and child in the nation.

Benita Anderson July 26, 2012 at 02:05 AM

I want to say that you all need to give president Obama the right to try what he believes is right for what ever problems we all face within the economic and also I believe that if President Obama was just a white men and not a black man then you all would have let him run this rt to work country the way he sees that he believes is the right way. Now you see President Bush did all of this when he was in office for about eight years. Now please you guys you all got to try to get along and fix the problems we are facing now.

Alvin Artis July 25, 2012 at 10:59 PM

The president has built a foundation into a program to allow the more of the country to be healthier. Is the foundation of the program perfect? No, it is not perfect. And neither was the original constitution. Some people would rather get health care for their dogs, than help their neighbor (American). Everyone has their numbers on what the PPACA will cost the country. The national debt wasn't that much of a deal until President Obama gained access to the country's wallet. I recall getting several checks from the previous administration to help stimulate the economy. But I still needed to claim the money on my taxes as earned income. So I was taxed on $ that I didn't ask for. The entire American system is screwed in some way form or fashion. Reversing the PPACA will not change a thing. The country will continue to increase its debt, because we have no other continents to occupy and destroy its inhabitants. A lot has changed around the world, and we are not the only country that should understand that changes need to be made. America continues to have the best form of democracy. And I would rather live in no other place. But the talks of the national debt need to go in a different direction. Thank you, A.Artis

P. Tailey July 25, 2012 at 07:55 PM

It is a start and I am waiting for the Republicans to propose an alternative to the Affordable Care Act since they want to repeal it.

Jeannie Andrews July 25, 2012 at 06:26 PM

I believe that there should be regulations on what can be charged for services, supplies and medications. I have tried to purchase insurance on my own. The plans that I can afford the premium on have incredibly high deductables that must be met. For as little as I go to the doctor it would be a lot cheaper for me to pay out of pocket for the services. Another point: If someone can't afford insurance how can they afford the fines for not having it? Everyone is so worried about the middle class and up. What about those like myself who barely reached the middle class mark last year for income? What about those struggling to stand on thier own? I have found that the system helps people who do nothing to help themselves and nothing to help those that are trying to make it on their own and to better themselves. I hate that I have no say in the choices that are being made regarding me. How can someone with a six figure income decide what a person like myself can afford?

Lloyd Becker July 25, 2012 at 02:27 PM

Accordingly, I have the complete Supreme Court Opinion on the ACA. According to Justice Ginsberg, her Opinion is that everyone will need healthcare at one time or another. This may be true to some degree, but a forced by health insurance is not commerce at all. It is a mandate; a mandate one can do without because the interim dictates that what is required, is bought at a higher cost. I, too, am a healthcare manager in title only with a degree from CTU in HCM. As Ens. Howell points out the problems with the ACA, I and others are looking in a corollary direction. Just as broccoli was brought into the equation, if people were forced to buy broccoli every time they enter a grocery store, how much more can the grocer charge for broccoli? Since the grocer knows that all persons entering their store must buy it. Health insurance is the same analogy. Health insurance will skyrocket, ALL employers will drop the health insurance benefit and no one will be able to afford insurance. This is one step closer to the single-payer that marks one item in the Marxist toolbox of communism. The way I interpret the mandate of EHR/MHR and HIEs, this will bring all health records on line for the governmental panel (IPAB), to begin the rationing of health care; much like Canada and England. I will stop right here because there is extremely much in this conversation.

What do you think?

 
 
 

Categories

Archives